Why Not Ban Large Corporations?

Gwenda Micheals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbbKjDjMDok

Marya Fehn: That comes at the cost of slow to none progress.

Ermelinda Stalnaker: If you get what you want who will make our vehicles? generate our electricity?

Ramon Dahlheimer: Look honey, two Anoncon losers calling me names! Get the camera!

Roosevelt Pendill: If you don't like it, you can switch states...unlike a national law

Joey Mekeel: Amazing! They're like Ticks. You have to pinch their heads off and then burn them to make sure they're dead!

Karey Dunken:

Cassey Hollinghurst: That is why we have a progressive tax, it keeps corporations from getting bigger then the people`s government to the point that we don`t have oversight. I read a article about McDonald's opening call centers overseas to take orders in the drive through in the U.S. it is being tested in CA.

Claude Gloden: I saw a question from an Anoncon, which I was blocked from naturally, and an ENT! IRE PAGE of Anoncons were the only ones that could answer, LOOOOLLLL!!!!!! Way to "argue those issues" cons.

Nedra Oltz: They were in a sense via anti-trust laws and anti-monopoly regulations. Then Reagan became president and that was the end of that.Corporations used Ronald Reagan to forge loopholes through the system. So now one company can own many subsidiaries in the same industry.

Adrian Sherlin: Do they let you breed? I hope not

Ariel Arons: written into it. I WONDER what else he thinks THAT'S WRONG? Why is he running as a Republican?

Loise Mausser: No, they're probably bullied in school or something. There's gotta be some explanation as to why they're this OCD and socially retarded.

Alexandria Popik: I can't. You just throw racist slurs.

Nell Dipiero: They are the ones running the world - who do you think can ban them?

Norma Marsalis: In process. It is called nationalizing. Deal only with the government, just like the ba! nks. That should fix it.

Raelene Cunnick: states rights! are an argument, but not justification. Just because it's within the intent of the tenth amendment, doesn't make it a good idea.

Benita Nancy: Okay, if we "ban" all large corporations, 95% of the things you own or use cease to exist.

Rosie Travino: Their views are too shameful to display.

Neville Dautremont: Because this is America, not Russia

Jefferson Sarson: Libcrushers don't operate well, I suppose, at all. They block you if you challenge them. Sometimes the libcrusher accounts go anon like losers. ~Aizen

Edmund Rappley: Yup sounds right to me. In an era of record profits and increased pollution, we need to tax runaway companies that destroy our land and water and pay less tax (by percentage of income) than the average American family.

Lorine Helwick: For one, it'd be anti-American and companies need to grow. Glass-Steagall served this country well for decades. I wouldn't mind seeing it return in some form.

Jayson Brod: as f! ar as THAT goes, that IS a "states rights" issue. so long as he doesn't try to impose it nationally he's on solid ground. I'm voting for Rick, however

Elmo Tervo: I agree

Bethanie Menden: Looks like you'll never be a business owner. If you don't expand you'll go down by larger competition.

Reyes Brunell: I saw a question from an Anoncon, which I was blocked from naturally, and an ENTIRE PAGE of Anoncons were the only ones that could answer, LOOOOLLLL!!!!!! Way to "argue those issues" cons.

Tomi Vauters: Most of the workforce would be unemployed. Large corporations provide the most jobs and usually the best ones.

Lahoma Beadell: Because the majority of American workers work for a large corporation or a subsidiary thereof...And they don't work for them... they buy stuff from them! (food to eat, cars to get to the store, gas to fill the car that gets you to the store, clothes that cover your kids, HOUSES YOU LIVE IN)

Frank Crummell: That'! s a little further down the list of Marxist goals of the 0 administrati! on. I expect they will get there some time next year.

Ester Bryand: Because they serve a functional purpose in foreign relations just like anything else.Many things have a functional aspect that is worth exploring before making any radical decisions. Most things don't become a problem until the people who control them, want to make them become a problem.And no, 95% of the things you enjoy, would not cease to exist.They would just be made by other types of large business, that were doing the same things we dislike about the large corporations.And no most of the workforce would not become unemployed. 70% of America's labor resides in small businesses.incorporation is more of a legal condition rather than a physical condition. It wouldn't stop big businesses from eroding the fundamentals of free market, by completely monopolizing their industry and creating economic pseudo-monarchs....Show more

Samatha Nicar: There is no way to stop them if they go the route of pa! ssage for the health care bill. Cap and trade legislation is the last card to be played to gain full control thorough the czars and regulatory agencies. Congress has granted carte blanche control to the czars without Congressional oversight. Each piece of legislation passed in the last 18 months contains wording and amendments that allows for the czars to take control of businesses and other parts of the private sector without permission by Congress. From the nationalization of businesses to the control of homeowner rights by the bureaucracy has been granted to the bureaucrats.Even if a Conservative majority is elected in November, there is little that they can do that Obama will not veto in the way of repeal of powers. If they have a large enough majority to override a veto, he will use the pocket veto option. We are technically under his control for at least two more years without recourse other than impeachment....Show more

Antone Bual: Interesting idea. But I beli! eve gov't should never bail out any business.I would not go so far as t! o ban large corporations though.

Eleni Mccier: YOU are the cupcake faggt, dipsht.

Claudio Drullard: Large corporations are not the problem. Small businesses cannot produce automobiles or airliners. We need both small businesses and large corporations.The problem is allowing our public servants to violate the Constitution, and get into areas they are prohibited from. For example, our public servants are prohibit ted from subsidizing or rescuing private interests. It is not the fact that these businesses exist that is the problem, the problem is that we allow our politicians to take money from the taxpayers, and give it to their benefactors.So, it is criminal politicians, and apathetic taxpayers who are the problem....Show more

Woodrow Neyman: Sebastian=HUNK Cade sounds alluring too Jackson is likewise a popularity that i detect alluring Royce & Jace= gay sounding (no offense to every physique with that call!) that is something on the subject of the "ce"! sound on the top of those 2. all of the others are basically wide-spread/in between for me. yet it is basically my opinion lol

Tana Dumoulin: We shouldn't be giving any money to any business. If you don't like automated phone systems, don't do business with those companies. If enough people agree with you, they may go out of business. It's none of your business how big or small a company is....Show more

Alexander Villas: The Obama Democrats in the U.S. Senate are at it again. Frustrated by lack of support for their absurd, economy-killing scheme to raise taxes on every American and throttle energy availability known as "Cap-and- Trade," they are opportunistically taking advantage of the tragic Gulf oil spill to push it back to the top of their disastrous socialist agenda. Not satisfied with the massive growth of Big Government they have imposed upon the American taxpayer after the "Stimulus," takeovers of private enterprise, and the atrocious seizure of our hea! lth care freedoms, they are desperate to squeeze even more income and l! iberty from our citizens with their greedy assault on energy production and use. Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid, with the blessing of President Obama, has said he wants a Cap-and-Trade Bill by the end of July. He has informed his committee chairs to look for every possible way to extract more punishing taxes from energy producers -- who will be forced to lay off workers or pass along the higher costs to consumers, already staggered by the Obama Democrats' economy-crippling dithering and spending. And Washington's leading Cap-and-Trade proponent, Sen. John Kerry, couldn't be happier, saying, "this is just what we needed with Congress coming back into session...just as we saw with health care, when the president throws down the gauntlet, and puts his prestige on the line and puts the full weight of the White House behind it, we can do big things." Big things, like foisting yet another oppressive and unnecessary leftist boondoggle on the overburdened backs of the American t! axpayer. Enough is enough, and I need you to do two things for me right now: • Tell Senator Reid not to use the tragedy in the Gulf as an excuse to further the Obama Democrats' leftist agenda by sending him a personalized e-postcard today; and, • Help our Party stop Harry Reid, John Kerry, and the rest of the Obama Democrats from doing any more damage to our economy and our freedom by stepping forward to support our work by making a special 2010 Mid-Term Election contribution to the RNC today. The time is now to draw the line -- no more leftist power grabs. Help us stop Harry Reid's assault on our prosperity by sending your e-postcard to Harry Reid and making an online contribution now. Sincerely, Michael SteeleChairman, Republican National Committee I think it sounds good. How about you?www.gop.com...Show more

Sharron Salin: Obviously you are a democrat. How is stifling business a good thing? If so many people want to "shut down" a big company all they have to ! do is leave their job. Everyone leaves and a company can't survive. But! people need their jobs. Big companies provide paychecks.

Alvaro Oare: OK, then. So how do you force companies to stay small?